From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reliable backup techniques |
Date: | 2003-02-19 19:22:35 |
Message-ID: | 200302191922.35351.dev@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 19 Feb 2003 5:23 pm, Ed L. wrote:
> I'd like to get some opinions on the best techniques for getting
> reliably consistent backups. My current understanding is that the
> only reliable way to get a consistent backup of a running system is
> through pg_dump or pg_dumpall.
Correct (pretty much).
> More specifically, it is my
> understanding that file backups (tar, etc) do not guarantee
> consistency due to the potential lag in cache writes to disk from
> running transactions.
Correct.
> Is my understanding correct? Are there other ways of getting
> consistent backups of a live system?
1. Stop postgresql alltogether, backup the entire data/base directory.
2. Replication (see mailing list archives/website for options)
pg_dump is almost certainly your best bet.
--
Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-02-19 19:56:03 | Re: Concurrency and locks |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-02-19 19:19:51 | Re: Removing spaces |