From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dev(at)archonet(dot)com, val(at)webtribe(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: which will be faster? w/ or w/o indices |
Date: | 2003-02-07 17:26:22 |
Message-ID: | 200302070926.22649.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Val,
> Can't really say without testing - it'll depend on the size of the various
> tables, X and Y disk speeds etc. The only suggestion I can make is to try
> an EXPLAIN (Reference manual, SQL commands) with and without
> ENABLE_SEQSCAN off (Admin guide ch 3.2).
Please use EXPLAIN ANALYZE instead of just EXPLAIN. That will show you
whether you have performance problems due to things outside of the planner's
control.
Keep in mind, though, that if your system has no special problems and your
planner statistics are up to date, the planner will do a good job of deciding
whether or not indexes are faster. You don't need to start out
second-guessing the planner ... you're likely to be wrong more often that it
is. Save that for real problem queries.
Also, upgrade to 7.2.4!!! 7.2.1 has several significant bugs, including two
security exploits and one backup-and-restore bug that could make it difficult
to recover your database from a backup file.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2003-02-07 18:54:32 | Re: bytea |
Previous Message | Alexander Stanier | 2003-02-07 17:07:18 | On delete cascade not working |