Re: which will be faster? w/ or w/o indices

From: dev(at)archonet(dot)com
To: val(at)webtribe(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: which will be faster? w/ or w/o indices
Date: 2003-02-07 09:36:54
Message-ID: 1064.192.168.1.16.1044610614.squirrel@mainbox.archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> I understand that if you are importing data into the database
> that this will go faster if there are no indices against the
> target table.
>
> If I want to run this statement:
> INSERT INTO table_a SELECT * from table_b WHERE value_1 BETWEEN
> X AND Y;
> is it best to do that with or without indices?

Can't really say without testing - it'll depend on the size of the various
tables, X and Y disk speeds etc. The only suggestion I can make is to try
an EXPLAIN (Reference manual, SQL commands) with and without
ENABLE_SEQSCAN off (Admin guide ch 3.2).

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Haller 2003-02-07 09:59:50 Re: conversi ms-sql7 vs postgresql 7.3
Previous Message Christoph Haller 2003-02-07 09:35:43 SET TIMEOUT equivalent / was: Lock timeout detection