| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Date: | 2003-02-01 12:36:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20030201123600.GA4598@ping.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:51:49PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:21:21PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > What do you mean with "compatibility addresses"? I don't know of
> > any such thing.
>
> | 96-bits | 32-bits |
> +--------------------------------------+--------------+
> | 0:0:0:0:0:0 | IPv4 Address |
> +--------------------------------------+--------------+
> IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Address Format
Oh, those. I forgot about them.
I've never seen anybody using them, and I can't think of a good
reason to use them either. They're not even routable now.
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kurt Roeckx | 2003-02-02 12:38:36 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-01 06:15:52 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-01 12:40:09 | Re: Win32 port powerfail testing |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-01 12:31:05 | Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2 |