From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Date: | 2003-01-31 23:51:49 |
Message-ID: | 20030131185149.N24535@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:21:21PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> What do you mean with "compatibility addresses"? I don't know of
> any such thing.
I'm thinking of these sorts of things (my faviourite description,
from RFC 2893):
IPv6/IPv4 nodes that perform automatic tunneling are assigned
IPv4-compatible address. An IPv4-compatible address is identified by
an all-zeros 96-bit prefix, and holds an IPv4 address in the
low-order 32-bits. IPv4-compatible addresses are structured as
follows:
| 96-bits | 32-bits |
+--------------------------------------+--------------+
| 0:0:0:0:0:0 | IPv4 Address |
+--------------------------------------+--------------+
IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Address Format
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-01 05:35:15 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-31 19:37:08 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-02-01 00:26:27 | Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-01-31 23:31:12 | Re: not using index for select min(...) |