From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: inet regression test |
Date: | 2003-01-15 20:00:00 |
Message-ID: | 200301152000.h0FK00922100@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
If you get it working, I can remove the ORDER BY's I added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > Looks like some ORDER BY statements would be useful.
>
> To do what? Those queries should already be producing indexscan plans.
> If you're not getting the expected answers, there is something that
> needs to be fixed, not papered over.
>
> Please try
>
> create index inet_idx1 on inet_tbl(i);
> set enable_seqscan to off;
> explain select * from inet_tbl where i<<'192.168.1.0/24'::cidr;
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-01-15 20:19:25 | Re: inet regression test |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-15 19:58:34 | Re: inet regression test |