From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: inet regression test |
Date: | 2003-01-15 20:19:25 |
Message-ID: | 1042661964.61110.38.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
regression=#
regression=#
regression=# create index inet_idx1 on inet_tbl(i);
CREATE INDEX
regression=# set enable_seqscan to off;
SET
regression=# explain select * from inet_tbl where
i<<'192.168.1.0/24'::cidr;
QUERY
PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using inet_idx1 on inet_tbl (cost=0.00..4.68 rows=7
width=64)
Index Cond: ((i > '192.168.1.0/24'::inet) AND (i <=
'192.168.1.255'::inet))
Filter: (i << '192.168.1.0/24'::inet)
(3 rows)
regression=# select * from inet_tbl where i<<'192.168.1.0/24'::cidr;
c | i
----------------+------------------
192.168.1.0/24 | 192.168.1.0/25
192.168.1.0/24 | 192.168.1.255/25
192.168.1.0/24 | 192.168.1.226
(3 rows)
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 14:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > Looks like some ORDER BY statements would be useful.
>
> To do what? Those queries should already be producing indexscan plans.
> If you're not getting the expected answers, there is something that
> needs to be fixed, not papered over.
>
> Please try
>
> create index inet_idx1 on inet_tbl(i);
> set enable_seqscan to off;
> explain select * from inet_tbl where i<<'192.168.1.0/24'::cidr;
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-15 20:22:43 | Re: inet regression test |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-15 20:00:00 | Re: inet regression test |