| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Return of INSTEAD rules |
| Date: | 2002-10-04 15:49:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200210041549.g94FnVZ07136@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am confused how yours differs from mine. I don't see how the last
> > matching tagged query would not be from an INSTEAD rule.
>
> You could have both INSTEAD and non-INSTEAD rules firing for the same
> original query. If the alphabetically-last rule is a non-INSTEAD rule,
> then there's a difference.
How do we get multiple rules on a query? I thought it was mostly
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, and those all operate on a single table.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-04 15:56:22 | Re: Threaded Sorting |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-04 15:48:33 | Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching |