Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am confused how yours differs from mine. I don't see how the last
> matching tagged query would not be from an INSTEAD rule.
You could have both INSTEAD and non-INSTEAD rules firing for the same
original query. If the alphabetically-last rule is a non-INSTEAD rule,
then there's a difference.
regards, tom lane