| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: |
| Date: | 2002-09-10 22:09:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200209102209.g8AM93217129@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 18:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I am confused. This wording seems fine to me.
>
> The confusion was mine. Of course, pg_dump doesn't create the
> database. I was mixing it up with pg_dumpall.
>
> However, there is a problem in that recent changes have made it quite
> likely that an upgrade will fail and will requre the dump script to be
> edited. There are some issues in pg_dump / pg_dumpall that need
> addressing before final release.
OK, can you specifically list them?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-09-10 22:22:19 | Re: |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-09-10 22:08:00 | Re: |