Re:

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-09-10 22:08:00
Message-ID: 1031695680.32359.862.camel@linda
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 18:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I am confused. This wording seems fine to me.

The confusion was mine. Of course, pg_dump doesn't create the
database. I was mixing it up with pg_dumpall.

However, there is a problem in that recent changes have made it quite
likely that an upgrade will fail and will requre the dump script to be
edited. There are some issues in pg_dump / pg_dumpall that need
addressing before final release.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Draw near to God and he will draw near to you.
Cleanse your hands, you sinners; and purify your
hearts, you double minded." James 4:8

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-09-10 17:38:00 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-09-10 22:09:03 from Bruce Momjian
  • Re: at 2002-09-11 03:43:11 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-10 22:09:03 Re:
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-09-10 21:50:52 Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc