| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in |
| Date: | 2002-08-21 18:05:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20020821150345.U36114-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 Aug 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Agreed. If patches are applied to the 7.4 branch as fast as normal,
> then maybe 7.4 will only be 6 months out with well tested Windows, PIT,
> etc. code that gets applied this October.
>
> Whats the intended branchpoint? Beta with less than 5 patches? 3rd
> beta start period? Less than 100 lines changed between betas?
Actually, I believe the agreement on branchpoint for this release was
release date ... with the normal having been a few weeks *after* release
in previous releases ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-21 18:06:29 | Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-21 18:03:20 | Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0002: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL |