| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in |
| Date: | 2002-08-20 16:28:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200208201228.27251.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 12:15 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Umm, but what about the reply buffer overrun advisory? I've read this
> > whole thread, and the reply advisory (AFAICT, unless I've just hit delete
> > too quickly) has NOT been addressed.
> Yes it has. CVS logs show
> I'd put more stock in the concern level of the people making complaints
> if anyone had bothered to do even that much legwork. Without an offered
> patch against 7.2 branch, I don't think the folks who push out releases
> (which is not me, but Marc, Bruce, you, Trond, etc) should bother to
> take notice of the complaints at all.
If a patch is proffered to 7.2.1 to fix this, I'll be happy to roll a new
RPMset. I tend to agree with you on this detail, Tom.
I had just apparently missed that portion; thanks for the reminder.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2002-08-20 16:31:28 | Re: [SECURITY] DoS attack on backend possible |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-20 16:15:38 | Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in |