From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in |
Date: | 2002-08-20 12:22:52 |
Message-ID: | 20020820122252.5B5C51C6A@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On August 19, 2002 11:58 pm, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 23:50, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> The simple fix is to drop the money type entirely as it serves few
> purposes -- but there are some who use it.
As the original creator of the type I probably have the most emotional
attachment to it but even I am thinking of dropping its use. I would have
preferred to fix it (more automatic casts and 64 bit storage as well as the
fixes in the current thread) but I seem to be alone so it hardly seems worth
it. I still think that there is some benefit to being able to do integer
arithmetic though. I know that I do a lot of calculations (mostly sums) on
money and going to numeric is going to be a hit. No matter how efficient it
is it can't be as efficient as a cpu register addition.
But maybe I'm wrong and the hit will be negligible.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2002-08-20 12:25:47 | bison news |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-08-20 12:05:45 | Re: regression test failures in CVS HEAD |