Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in
Date: 2002-08-20 14:21:25
Message-ID: 1029853286.99470.4.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 08:22, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On August 19, 2002 11:58 pm, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 23:50, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > The simple fix is to drop the money type entirely as it serves few
> > purposes -- but there are some who use it.
>
> As the original creator of the type I probably have the most emotional
> attachment to it but even I am thinking of dropping its use. I would have
> preferred to fix it (more automatic casts and 64 bit storage as well as the

> But maybe I'm wrong and the hit will be negligible.

It wouldn't fix this particular problem anyway :) -- so I'm going to
vote to keep it.

Though for my own work I've created a money domain due to lack of digits
with the type -- not to mention I needed to store hundredths of a cent.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-08-20 15:08:37 Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-20 14:09:01 Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in