| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql |
| Date: | 2002-08-16 19:50:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200208161950.g7GJoLn05309@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
[ Tom will review.]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> > >> A couple of bits of the depend/constraint patch that were not applied.
> >
> > Again, this is code I still gotta review...
>
> The attached better handles constraint triggers which are not foreign
> keys. It helps 7.2.
>
> Is there any reason to create new constraint triggers? Could the
> CONSTRAINT clause be removed after a couple of releases?
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-16 20:22:55 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-08-16 19:40:40 | Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql |