| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql |
| Date: | 2002-08-16 19:40:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1029526841.29411.12.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> >> A couple of bits of the depend/constraint patch that were not applied.
>
> Again, this is code I still gotta review...
The attached better handles constraint triggers which are not foreign
keys. It helps 7.2.
Is there any reason to create new constraint triggers? Could the
CONSTRAINT clause be removed after a couple of releases?
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fkey.patch | text/plain | 18.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-16 19:50:21 | Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-16 15:48:43 | Re: connect_timeout parameter in libpq |