Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date: 2002-08-03 01:17:12
Message-ID: 200208030117.g731HCU08596@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=16:
> > > (average = 28.6 seconds)
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=32:
> > > (average = 29.15 seconds)
>
> That is almost a 2 percent cost. Shall we challenge someone to get us
> back 2 percent from somewhere before the 7.3 release? Optimizing a hot
> spot might do it...

I wasn't terribly concerned because this wasn't a 2% on normal workload
test, it was a 2% bang on function calls as fast as you can test.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-03 01:46:28 Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-08-03 01:15:03 Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates