Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates
Date: 2002-08-03 01:15:03
Message-ID: 1028337304.11710.14.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> An even more radical approach is to get rid of the hardwired index name
> lists in indexing.h, and instead expect CatalogOpenIndices to make use
> of the index OID lists that are maintained by the relcache (since 7.1 or
> so). Then the typical call would reduce to
>
> CatalogUpdateIndexes(Relation, HeapTuple);

This would be great. Anyway to take it one step further and make it
transparent? Hide it in heap_insert / update?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-03 01:17:12 Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-03 01:12:39 Re: WAL file location