Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date: 2002-08-02 16:28:48
Message-ID: 20020802132759.H83339-100000@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too. The thing to be benchmarking
> > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
>
> I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS
> guys; don't they write everything in TCL?

Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the 'TCL' is the
web pages themselves, vs using something like PHP ... I may be wrong, but
I do not believe any of the functions are in TCL ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Wickstrom 2002-08-02 16:35:10 Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Previous Message J. R. Nield 2002-08-02 16:26:52 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations