Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

From: Brett Schwarz <brett_schwarz(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date: 2002-08-02 12:13:15
Message-ID: 1028290396.30577.968.camel@thor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 09:28, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too. The thing to be benchmarking
> > > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
> >
> > I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS
> > guys; don't they write everything in TCL?
>
> Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the 'TCL' is the
> web pages themselves, vs using something like PHP ... I may be wrong, but
> I do not believe any of the functions are in TCL ...
>

Nope, some are written in Tcl. Most are in plpgsql, mainly I believe so
that the port between Oracle and PG is easier.

--brett

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Brett Schwarz
brett_schwarz AT yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Alan Dorman 2002-08-02 12:47:38 Re: Trimming the Fat, Part Deux ...
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-08-02 11:59:20 Build errors with current CVS