From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: several minor cleanups |
Date: | 2002-07-16 06:05:48 |
Message-ID: | 200207160605.g6G65mv08451@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:32:13PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > After no adverse comments from the 'general' list, I have applied this
> > part of the patch. Should we consider getting rid of the Exec part, so
> > it just says "Insert/Update" rather than "ExecInsert/ExecUpdate"?
>
> Well, I think the practice of reporting C function names for
> user-visible error messages isn't a particularly good idea -- but if
> we'd like to fix that, this is only one of numerous error messages that
> need to be corrected.
>
Is there any desire for this to be done? I am willing to remove all the
function name references in the code and replace them with meaningful
text if needed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-16 06:06:57 | Re: GRANT / REVOKE on functions |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-16 06:03:01 | Re: Table Function API doc patch |