| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL |
| Date: | 2002-06-07 16:05:33 |
| Message-ID: | 200206071705.33642.dev@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Friday 07 Jun 2002 4:20 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > While PG's FROM extension makes life simple, I can't believe there's
> > not a way
> > to do an update on a join using standard SQL.
>
> I don't understand why you're worried about this. The lack of UPDATE
> .. FROM is widely regarded as an omission by the ANSI committee, and
> most SQL RDBMS support it, including MS SQL Server and Oracle. I'm not
> sure about MySQL, but MySQL doesn't support sub-selects either.
Tell me about it. Where I'm using MySQL on client web-servers I find myself
porting the data into PG to massage it then putting the results back into
MySQL. One of the things missing from the various reviews/comparisons on the
web is any actual comparison of usage for DBA tasks (as opposed to handling a
message-board app etc)
> Is there a database you're tinking of that sticks to the strict SQL92
> definitions? OpenBase, maybe?
Nope - mostly work with PG/MySQL/MS-SQL/Access. I use all the features at the
psql prompt, but like to stick to the standard for app-generated queries.
Thanks Josh
- Richard Huxton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-06-07 16:38:28 | Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-07 15:53:54 | Re: PL/pgSQL TODO |