Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL
Date: 2002-06-07 16:38:28
Message-ID: 20020607093629.Y37907-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Richard Huxton wrote:

> I've been happily using statements like
> UPDATE a SET flag=1 FROM b WHERE a.id=b.id AND b.foo='x';
>
> While PG's FROM extension makes life simple, I can't believe there's not a way
> to do an update on a join using standard SQL. The two options I can think of
> are:
>
> 1. using a sub-select
> UPDATE a SET flag=1 WHERE a.id IN (SELECT id FROM b WHERE b.foo='X');
> Which is fine, but no good for mysql, hits PG's speed issue with IN and a bit
> clumsy for more complicated examples.

Well, on PG you might want to try some EXISTS form, but I think this is
the way you're probably intended to do it under SQL92 at least.

> 2. building an updatable view.

Well, AFAICS this is mostly a special case of the above. It looks to me
that updatable views can't have multiple tables in the from clause so
you'd have to write the select with a subquery anyway (and I'm not 100%
sure that's correct either).

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-06-07 18:10:24 Re: PL/pgSQL TODO
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2002-06-07 16:05:33 Re: UPDATE ... FROM vs standard SQL