| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Leif Jensen <leif(at)crysberg(dot)dk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PHP, HTML Forms & PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2002-04-08 11:06:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20020408210623.B2829@svana.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:52:48PM +0200, Leif Jensen wrote:
> I have looked in the HTML 4.0 recommendation, which talks about how
> form data is being handled, but it doesn't say anything about how PHP
> treats the result.
Hmm, I'm not sure then, but this is the way I've always known it to work.
> That's a possibility if you on forehand know the name(s) of checkboxes
> in your form. I was trying to make a general sql construction of an update
> statement independent of what might be in the form. !?
Well, I don't know if you can get the variables in a hash, like in perl.
Another thing that sometimes works is:
<input type=hidden name=box value=f>
<input type=checkbox name=box value=t>
When the tickbox is ticked, the browser will return two values named "box",
which *may* cancel out to give you your t/f combo.
Note this is extremely system specific and not guarenteed and not
recommended. But I have used it successfully on occasion.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Ignorance continues to thrive when intelligent people choose to do
> nothing. Speaking out against censorship and ignorance is the imperative
> of all intelligent people.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leif Jensen | 2002-04-08 11:10:52 | Re: I18n & Pgaccess ( & psql) |
| Previous Message | Tille, Andreas | 2002-04-08 10:53:51 | Re: I18n & Pgaccess ( & psql) |