| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Date: | 2002-04-08 08:29:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20020408102935.B3729@zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:13:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems clear to me that SET *should* roll back on abort. Just a
> matter of how important is it to fix.
I want control on this :-)
SET valname = 'vatdata' ON ROLLBACK UNSET;
or
SET valname = 'vatdata';
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2002-04-08 08:44:37 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2002-04-08 08:22:11 | Re: timeout implementation issues |