Re: binary data storage

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: Denis Gasparin <denis(at)edistar(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Mailing Lists-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: binary data storage
Date: 2002-04-04 14:46:59
Message-ID: 20020404144701.055A0FDD8@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jue 04 Abr 2002 11:32, you wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> I discourage you to use the large object data type for a file of such
> dimensions... It would be better for you to store in the db the filename
> and the path to the file itself.
> However you can find the large object you've inserted in your data
> directory (subdirectory base/oid of your database/).

I still don't get it.
If I use pg_lo* to put my binary data in the database, where will it be,
always talking about the structure of the database.
Example:
A table with 5 fields, and one is of type oid, and I want to insert data (a
new row to the table) in which I have a binary file to put in the oid field.

And how about if I have more then one oid field?

I see no specification on which field the binary object will be inserted.

--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Marzen 2002-04-04 14:52:55 Re: [NOVICE] readline and psql
Previous Message Heiko Klein 2002-04-04 14:32:50 Re: [NOVICE] readline and psql