Re: Small question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Joep deVocht <joep(at)masktools(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small question
Date: 2002-03-22 18:48:36
Message-ID: 200203221848.g2MImaN18033@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Joep deVocht wrote:
> >> Is there a way to determine whether a transaction
> >> is started and not ended yet?
>
> > I think it's time to add a little boolean function, that
> > actually returns IsTransactionBlock(), and have a libpq side
> > wrapper around PQfn() calling it.
>
> If you're in TRANSACTION ABORT state, I do not think that will work.
>
> Offhand this seems more of a protocol issue. A straightforward solution
> would be to add a status indicator (with three states: out of
> transaction, in transaction, in aborted transaction) to the
> ReadyForQuery message, but we can't do that without a protocol change,
> which is probably more trouble than it's worth.

Yes, I was wondering if it was worth having the client call the function
at the end of every query.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Siebert 2002-03-22 18:49:46 Re: Yet another indexing issue.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-22 18:43:36 Re: Small question