| From: | Fernando Schapachnik <fschapachnik(at)vianetworks(dot)com(dot)ar> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Database quota |
| Date: | 2002-03-15 20:45:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20020315174556.M74373@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribió:
> Fernando Schapachnik <fschapachnik(at)vianetworks(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
> > Is there any way to stablish a maximum size for a database? Would
> > setting each database directory to user:pgsql, 770 and setting a file
> > system quota for user "user" work? I mean, would postmaster handle
> > the limit gracefully?
>
> If you can exclude pg_xlog and pg_clog from the quota, I believe that
> failure to extend other tables would be reasonably graceful. Failure to
> extend the log files will cause a system stop, however. (The good news
> is that the sizes of the log file directories are fairly predictable.
> Log file segments are recycled when no longer needed, so the total space
> used doesn't really grow without bound, at least not in 7.2.)
Taking that into account everything works fine.
Thanks!
Fernando P. Schapachnik
fschapachnik(at)vianetworks(dot)com(dot)ar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-15 21:00:00 | Re: Why is it not using an index? |
| Previous Message | Gregory Wood | 2002-03-15 20:34:46 | Re: Why is it not using an index? |