Re: lo_open problems

James Leigh wrote:
> Tthat was it, Thanks. I did not see that in the docs, it should be
> added.
>
> cheers,
> james
>
>
> On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 18:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> > James Leigh <james(dot)leigh(at)ottawa(dot)com> writes:
> > > I am using some large object, but lo_open always returns -1. I don't
> > > know why.
> >
> > Are you doing this inside a transaction block?
> >

I see it in the docs. It is missing somewhere else?

<note>
<para>
All large object manipulation <emphasis>must</emphasis> take
place within an SQL transaction. This requirement is strictly
enforced as of <productname>PostgreSQL 6.5</>, though it has been an
implicit requirement in previous versions, resulting in
misbehavior if ignored.
</para>
</note>
</para>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026