Re: lo_open problems

From: James Leigh <james(dot)leigh(at)ottawa(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lo_open problems
Date: 2002-03-05 19:56:57
Message-ID: 1015358218.1071.1.camel@jacob
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tthat was it, Thanks. I did not see that in the docs, it should be
added.

cheers,
james

On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 18:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> James Leigh <james(dot)leigh(at)ottawa(dot)com> writes:
> > I am using some large object, but lo_open always returns -1. I don't
> > know why.
>
> Are you doing this inside a transaction block?
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-03-05 19:59:27 Re: Mandrake RPMs uploaded
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-05 19:49:10 Re: Field types