Re: Status of index location patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net
Cc: Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of index location patch
Date: 2002-03-03 20:46:54
Message-ID: 200203032046.g23KktC25812@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I stopped all work on this since people seemed confused about the
> tablespace/location words. I don't think enough of the "core" team likes
> this idea. Am I wrong here? Did I explain the patch good enough?
>
> Please let me know, I still am planning on doing it for internal use. I
> would prefer that it was a standard feature. If you think I should still
> pursue this, let me know what I need to do to get it off the ground.

I think ideally we need to work in the direction outlined in the TODO
list link for tablespaces. We clearly need this functionality, but I
think there is a perception we need to do it right the first time. I
don't see your work as that far away from where we want to be so I
encourage you to read the link next to tablespaces and see what parts
you like and what parts you don't.

The usual steps are to outline the functionality you want to add, then
we can discuss implementation. It is a feature we very badly need.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-03 21:40:23 Re: plpgsql Field of Record issue
Previous Message Jim Buttafuoco 2002-03-03 20:34:36 Re: Status of index location patch