Re: Is vacuum full lock like old's vacuum's lock?

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is vacuum full lock like old's vacuum's lock?
Date: 2002-03-01 22:21:41
Message-ID: 20020301172120.N6753-100000@zoraida.natserv.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1 Mar 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:

> Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Recently moved to 7.2 and have been mainly doing "vacuum analyze". I have
> > only run "vacuum full" on the weekend when nobody is using the server. I
> > am wondering if "vacuum full" locks the tables like the old vacuum did.
>
> AFIAK "vacuum full" is exactly the same as the old "vacuum".

Thanks. So I will continue to do it "off hours".

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2002-03-01 22:23:12 Re: Shared buffers vs large files
Previous Message Antonio Gennarini 2002-03-01 22:01:48 Networking support for postgres isn't working.