| From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix |
| Date: | 2001-11-11 04:25:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20011110232542.B98688@rcfile.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On 10 Nov 2001 at 22:42 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > exactly. which is why we've gotta inspecy the relname to determine
| > which of the attnames to modify.
|
| My point is that inspecting the tgfoid is safer, because it
| unambiguously tells you what you are looking at. The relname is
| inherently ambiguous because it could be the same on both sides.
gotcha! I'm digging further into how the F_RI_FKEY_* defines
relate to this case.
thanks.
brent
--
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brent Verner | 2001-11-11 09:06:14 | Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-11 03:42:59 | Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix |