From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC Statement.executeBatch patch |
Date: | 2001-08-28 16:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 200108281615.f7SGFqi28869@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> Attached is a patch for current CVS, consisting of a cvs diff -c
> for the changed files and a few new files:
> - test/jdbc2/BatchExecuteTest.java
> - util/MessageTranslator.java
> - jdbc2/PBatchUpdateException.java
>
> As an aside, is this the best way to submit a patch consisting
> of both changed and new files? Or is there a smarter cvs command
> which gets them all in one patch file?
>
> This patch fixes batch processing in the JDBC driver to be
> JDBC-2 compliant. Specifically, the changes introduced by this
> patch are:
>
> 1) Statement.executeBatch() no longer commits or rolls back a
> transaction, as this is not prescribed by the JDBC spec. Its up
> to the application to disable autocommit and to commit or
> rollback the transaction. Where JDBC talks about "executing the
> statements as a unit", it means executing the statements in one
> round trip to the backend for better performance, it does not
> mean executing the statements in a transaction.
>
> 2) Statement.executeBatch() now throws a BatchUpdateException()
> as required by the JDBC spec. The significance of this is that
> the receiver of the exception gets the updateCounts of the
> commands that succeeded before the error occurred. In order for
> the messages to be translatable, java.sql.BatchUpdateException
> is extended by org.postgresql.jdbc2.PBatchUpdateException() and
> the localization code is factored out from
> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException to a separate singleton class
> org.postgresql.util.MessageTranslator.
>
> 3) When there is no batch or there are 0 statements in the batch
> when Statement.executeBatch() is called, do not throw an
> SQLException, but silently do nothing and return an update count
> array of length 0. The JDBC spec says "Throws an SQLException if
> the driver does not support batch statements", which is clearly
> not the case. See testExecuteEmptyBatch() in
> BatchExecuteTest.java for an example. The message
> postgresql.stat.batch.empty is removed from the language
> specific properties files.
>
> 4) When Statement.executeBatch() is performed, reset the
> statement's list of batch commands to empty. The JDBC spec isn't
> 100% clear about this. This behaviour is only documented in the
> Java tutorial
> (http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jdbc/jdbc2dot0/batchupdates.html)
> Note that the Oracle JDBC driver also resets the statement's
> list in executeBatch(), and this seems the most reasonable
> interpretation.
>
> 5) A new test case is added to the JDBC test suite which tests
> various aspects of batch processing. See the new file
> BatchExecuteTest.java.
>
> Regards,
> Ren? Pijlman
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-08-28 16:28:36 | Re: [PATCHES] JDBC Statement.executeBatch patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-28 16:15:40 | Re: Attempt to clean up ExecSql() in JDBC |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-08-28 16:28:36 | Re: [PATCHES] JDBC Statement.executeBatch patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-28 16:15:40 | Re: Attempt to clean up ExecSql() in JDBC |