From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Good software takes 10 years |
Date: | 2001-07-20 10:59:11 |
Message-ID: | 200107201059.f6KAxBB26708@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Nice article about good software taking ten years to develop. I think
> > PostgreSQL can be classed at 15 years now, and it is being developed at
> > Internet speed too:
> > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/stories/storyReader$368
>
> I think the slashdot discussion is more interesting than the original
> article:
>
> http://slashdot.org/developers/01/07/19/0145222.shtml
>
> In particular, the slashdotters observe that there's more than one
> kind of software. For big projects, ten years seems about right...
I am never sure if posting info about appropriate articles is ok for
this list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2001-07-20 11:21:51 | Re: Good software takes 10 years |
Previous Message | Ben-Nes Michael | 2001-07-20 08:03:47 | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE |