From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
Date: | 2001-07-12 18:48:20 |
Message-ID: | 200107121848.f6CImKm22898@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> I notice the "urgent" item for point-in-time recovery doesn't have
> >> the '-' indicating a 7.2 item.
> >>
> >> When is that planned?
>
> > I hope for 7.2.
>
> What grounds do you have for hoping that? If there's anyone working
> on it, they're sure keeping a mighty low profile.
>
> Given that we're hoping to go beta in another six weeks or so, anything
> that's not got a commitment from someone now is unlikely to be finished
> for 7.2. I don't believe that anything as large as PIT recovery is
> going to magically appear out of the woodwork.
Someone told me they would do it. I will not disclose their name
because I don't think I have the right to do that.
I haven't heard from them in a while. Let's just assume the feature
will not be in 7.2 then.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-12 19:00:16 | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-12 18:44:25 | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |