| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
| Date: | 2001-07-12 19:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | 11647.994964416@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> ... I don't believe that anything as large as PIT recovery is
>> going to magically appear out of the woodwork.
> Someone told me they would do it. I will not disclose their name
> because I don't think I have the right to do that.
And if "hacker X" delivers a patch that large a week or so before beta,
with no prior discussion of features or implementation techniques on
the mailing lists, we'd accept it? Hacker X needs to be told that
that's not how this project is run.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-12 19:01:53 | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-12 18:48:20 | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |