From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Damien Clermonté <damien(dot)clermonte(at)free(dot)fr>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Patch to make pg_hba.conf handle virtualhost access control and samehost keyword |
Date: | 2001-07-11 22:19:31 |
Message-ID: | 200107112219.f6BMJVi03002@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > > Maybe it should be cached in memory and only be re-read on request
> > > (SIGHUP). Parsing that file every time is undoubtedly a large
> > fraction of
> > > the total connection startup time.
> >
> > Okay with me if someone wants to do it ... but that'd be a lot more work
> > than just moving the documentation ...
>
> Or cache the information and just do a file modification timestamp check on
> each connection to see if it needs to be reread. (Best of both worlds??)
Rather than having to create data structures for the complex pg_hba.conf
format, I am going to do a quick-and-dirty and load the non-comment
lines into a List of strings and have the postmaster read that. It will
reload from the file on sighup, just like we do for postgresql.conf.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2001-07-11 22:28:21 | Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) |
Previous Message | Mark Volpe | 2001-07-11 22:06:56 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-07-12 00:00:33 | Patch to add support for partial indices |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-11 22:14:27 | Re: encode in base code |