Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there
Date: 2001-07-11 16:55:07
Message-ID: 200107111655.f6BGt7N13253@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:58:41PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> > > You'll need to do an initdb after this (I think) because it adds a new
> > > internal function. I used OID 1716, I hope nobody is using that one right
> > > now.
> > >
> >
> > I asked this one myself not too long ago :-)
> >
> > There's a shell script:
> > ~/pgsql/src/include/catalog/unused_oids
>
> Thanks. I did use the script and it says it's free. But maybe someone else
> has a patch somewhere else right now wnho is using it. The only way we'll
> find out is if they both get added and somebody notices.
>
> Does somewhere check for duplicate oids?

Yes, I usually check that when I do a patch that adds OID's, or at least
I should. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos 2001-07-11 16:58:59 Re: Parsing error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-11 16:51:59 Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?