Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there
Date: 2001-07-11 06:17:18
Message-ID: 20010711161718.A2552@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:58:41PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> > You'll need to do an initdb after this (I think) because it adds a new
> > internal function. I used OID 1716, I hope nobody is using that one right
> > now.
> >
>
> I asked this one myself not too long ago :-)
>
> There's a shell script:
> ~/pgsql/src/include/catalog/unused_oids

Thanks. I did use the script and it says it's free. But maybe someone else
has a patch somewhere else right now wnho is using it. The only way we'll
find out is if they both get added and somebody notices.

Does somewhere check for duplicate oids?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2001-07-11 06:53:21 Re: Function Won't Compile
Previous Message Joe Conway 2001-07-11 05:58:41 Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there