Re: Correct syntex for implicit curor in for loops

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct syntex for implicit curor in for loops
Date: 2001-06-21 17:35:35
Message-ID: 200106211735.f5LHZap02411@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jan,
>
> > From version 7.2 on PL/pgSQL will automatically use implicit
> > cursors in FOR loops and will support explicit cursors and
> > reference cursors that can be passed around between functions
> > and/or the main application.
>
> ALL RIGHT!!!
>
> Sorry, just a bit of unrestrained enthusiasm.
>
> Is there a tentative timeline for 7.2?

With our last closeness of the real release date vs. the
first estimations, and we don't even have a proposal up to
now - well, maybe this or next year is the most precise I can
tell you ;-}

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2001-06-21 17:47:09 Re: Extracting date from epoche
Previous Message James Orr 2001-06-21 17:30:39 Changing PL/pgSQL triggers