| From: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: inet/cidr type comparisons |
| Date: | 2001-06-11 17:51:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20010611135142.Y10741@reptiles.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:16:01PM -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> Apologies for asking so many questions, but I'd like a sanity check before
> proceeding :)
while you are in there, can you cahnge the print functions so that they
are consistent?
the output should be 'x.x.x.x' or 'x.x.x.x/x'.
in some cases, i have seen select's which output 'x.x.x/24', which totally
defeats the purpose of classless ip addrs.
either the addrs are classless, or they are not.
the current print stuff seems to make special cases of classful addresses.
--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-06-11 17:59:52 | Re: inet/cidr type comparisons |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-11 17:41:01 | Re: inet/cidr type comparisons |