| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
| Date: | 2001-05-09 17:24:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200105091724.f49HOX712850@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I'm concearned about this because we are going to switch our
> fist server to a Journaling FS (on Linux). Searching and asking
> I found out that for our short term work we need ReiserFS (it's
> for a proxy server). Put the interesting thing was that for
> large (very large) files, everybody recomends XFS. The drawback
> of XFS is that it's very, very sloooow when deleting files.
Why do all these file systems seem to have one major negative?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2001-05-09 17:59:55 | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-05-09 17:09:53 | Re: I still cannot force pg_dump to disable triggers |