Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

Makes it more fun :) Kinda like a lottery ticket:

- reliable (cherry)
- fast (cherry)
- resource hog (lemon)
--
Rod Taylor
BarChord Entertainment Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Martín Marqués" <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
Cc: "Trond Eivind Glomsrød" <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>;
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

> > I'm concearned about this because we are going to switch our
> > fist server to a Journaling FS (on Linux). Searching and asking
> > I found out that for our short term work we need ReiserFS (it's
> > for a proxy server). Put the interesting thing was that for
> > large (very large) files, everybody recomends XFS. The drawback
> > of XFS is that it's very, very sloooow when deleting files.
>
> Why do all these file systems seem to have one major negative?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>