Re: /contrib 'cosmetic'

Added to TODO:

* Rename some /contrib modules from pg* to pg_*

> On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >
> > > In future ... please ignore patches those ignore the /contrib's practice
> > > -- the trouble is overhaul the contrib tree during each version.
> >
> > The reason it's in contrib is that it's a bit less than perfect. If we
> > were to prioritize on maintaining contrib, then we might as well fold it
> > into the core (which we ought to consider for some items). IMHO.
>
> Agree. You good remember previous state of the contrib -- something
> wasn't compile-able, something was total dead ..etc. I want see nice code
> in contrib and not say "the contrib is our trash and everybody can postpone
> something here" (it not means currect state is bad. It's better than
> before 7.1, it's care about future :-).
>
> Karel
>
> --
> Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
> http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
>
> C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026