Re: /contrib 'cosmetic'

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: /contrib 'cosmetic'
Date: 2001-03-19 17:22:04
Message-ID: 20010319182204.B10472@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>
> > In future ... please ignore patches those ignore the /contrib's practice
> > -- the trouble is overhaul the contrib tree during each version.
>
> The reason it's in contrib is that it's a bit less than perfect. If we
> were to prioritize on maintaining contrib, then we might as well fold it
> into the core (which we ought to consider for some items). IMHO.

Agree. You good remember previous state of the contrib -- something
wasn't compile-able, something was total dead ..etc. I want see nice code
in contrib and not say "the contrib is our trash and everybody can postpone
something here" (it not means currect state is bad. It's better than
before 7.1, it's care about future :-).

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-19 17:27:50 Re: AW: AW: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-19 16:50:15 Re: Performance monitor signal handler