| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Date: | 2001-03-15 20:32:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200103152032.PAA16090@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Can someone explain why configure/platform-specific flags are allowed to
> > be added at this stage in the release, but my pgmonitor patch was
> > rejected?
>
> Possibly just because Marc hasn't stomped on me quite yet ;-)
>
> However, I can actually make a case for this: we are flushing out
> performance bugs in a new feature, ie WAL.
You did a masterful job of making my pgmonitor patch sound like a debug
aid instead of a feature too. :-)
Have you considered a career in law. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-15 20:36:36 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-15 20:30:03 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |