Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date: 2001-03-15 20:29:23
Message-ID: 15099.984688163@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone explain why configure/platform-specific flags are allowed to
> be added at this stage in the release, but my pgmonitor patch was
> rejected?

Possibly just because Marc hasn't stomped on me quite yet ;-)

However, I can actually make a case for this: we are flushing out
performance bugs in a new feature, ie WAL.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-15 20:30:03 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-15 20:26:59 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC