From: | Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: how critical is WAL |
Date: | 2001-02-22 20:48:50 |
Message-ID: | 20010222204850.25403.qmail@web2902.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I happenned to come across the following in the
> > documentation on WAL implementation in v7.1 -
> >
> >
>
*****************************************************
>
> > Before WAL, any crash during writing could result
> in:
> >
> > 1.index tuples pointing to non-existent table
> rows
> >
> > 2.index tuples lost in split operations
> >
> > 3.totally corrupted table or index page
> content,
> > because of partially written data pages
> >
>
*****************************************************
>
> Indexes could get corrupt, requiring rebuilding.
> That problem is gone
> with WAL. Transaction commits where always safe.
>
Thanks. I was specifically asking about Result '3'
above mentions 'totally corrupted table page content
because of partially written data pages' . Is this
also repairable ?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-22 20:55:53 | Re: psql - use of deafult editor |
Previous Message | Brent R. Matzelle | 2001-02-22 20:48:04 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.1 Linux Installation |